Today's 30 papers are dominated by a single question: what should a robot predict about the future? Seven papers build world-action models (WAMs) and, read together, they reject the default of predicting future video. UNITAS (#3) argues for metric 3D scene flow because pixel distances are not physical distances (49% lower displacement error than PointWorld, 99.8% on LIBERO); MiniWAM (#10) shows that compact inverse-dynamics-shaped targets with 65Γ fewer tokens outperform native DINOv3 or video-VAE futures and train 8Γ faster; PlanWAM (#13) applies the same idea to driving, letting the planning loss shape the future latent (93.8 PDMS on NAVSIM); LiteNWM (#16) gets a 128Γ speedup by scoring candidate trajectories in latent space; and Spatial Language Modeling (#2) goes furthest, predicting explicit contour tokens. DreamTrue (#21) is the exception that proves the rule: it stays in video, but needs counterfactual post-training and a learned defect reward to cut physically implausible outcomes from 48% to 6%. The emerging consensus is that a world model's future should be shaped by what control needs, not by what a video generator happens to produce.
The second theme is human data at scale, bridged by a shared latent space instead of kinematic retargeting. VioLA (#8) trains a humanoid generalist on 140M frames, 93% of them human, by predicting body and hand motion latents that a pretrained controller executes. It reaches 100% zero-shot locomotion success where GR00T N1.7 manages 16.7%. Being-M0.7 (#14) puts the bridge earlier, in a visual-motion prior learned from 10k hours of mixed human video and motion. Generative Neural Retargeting (#22) replaces per-demo MPC with flow-matching sampling, using 8.5% of the samples and doubling success. TACROSS (#24) does the same for touch, aligning a $11 glove with robot sensors at the contact-event level. Dex-One2Many (#7) and YOCO (#28) round this out: one abstracts a single human video into scene-graph constraints, and the other removes per-user glove bias. Across these papers, cheap human data plus a learned translation layer is replacing expensive teleoperation.
A third, more contrarian thread asks how much a frozen foundation model can do with better scaffolding. ARC (#26) improves Ο0.5's real-robot success by 82 points using only auto-labeled, action-grounded reasoning traces. SpatialHarness (#9) lifts a frozen GPT-6 Astra from 0% to 100% on Tower of Hanoi by rendering virtual camera views from a digital twin, and Rendering-Free Lookahead (#20) learns that same 'where to look' judgement offline. SuperNav (#4) builds an agent harness around an un-fine-tuned MLLM for navigation. The sharpest challenge is Embodied Turing Machines (#15): it removes the model from the loop entirely, uses coding agents to grow a code-only policy library (70% on 42 bimanual tasks), and proposes that library as a data engine for VLAs. RoboAware (#29) sits in between, learning only when to hand control to code and when to an end-to-end policy. On the classical side, the controlled benchmark in #5 offers a useful rule of thumb that applies to this debate too: hand-built structure wins when dynamics are predictable, and learning wins when they are stochastic.
Models that jointly predict actions and future states β and today's sharp debate over what that 'future' should look like: pixels, 3D flow, compact latents, or planning-shaped codes.
Getting more out of frozen or lightly adapted foundation models at test time: virtual views, reasoning traces, code-as-policy libraries and learned skill coordinators.
Turning abundant human motion, video and touch into robot-executable data β via shared latents, generative retargeting, scene graphs and cheap gloves.
Agentic MLLM navigation, learning where to look, and infrastructure-free relative localization for robot teams.
General-purpose training recipes: privileged-to-RGB-D curricula, higher-order action losses, and a controlled classical-vs-RL planning comparison.
Hybrid model/learning controllers on racing cars, quadrotors in wind and surface vessels β plus catalog-scale orbital conjunction screening.